Re: Closing bugs with bad stack trace as INCOMPLETE

[Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>]

Vincent Untz wrote:

> I'd like us to fix this. I see two possibilities: either introduce a new
> BADSTACKTRACE status, similar to NEEDINFO but only about incomplete
> stack traces, or decide that it's okay for us to close the bugs as
> INCOMPLETE and reopen them if the reporter comes with more details.
> This second option is probably easier.
>  

FWIW, when I did lots of triaging I used to close bad stack traces with 
INCOMPLETE. A good justification for this is that if you want to help by 
eg. installing debug packages and resubmitting a trace, the easiest way 
to do that is to run bug-buddy again and just submit a new bug (and this 
is what most reporters do anyway).

--
Andrew