Re: open office stack traces

[michael meeks <michael meeks novell com>]

Hi Luis,

On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 00:03 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> There are about 670 bug reports with 'soffice.bin' in the comment:

	Yes - it's pretty shameful really; OTOH. they should have been getting
filed in Ximian Bugzilla - I guess we somehow screwed that up.

> , most of which have been filed in the past 11 months, and about 500
> of which appear to be from RH distros:

	More users, more bugs ? or both ? ;->

> You'll note that basically all of them have been NOTGNOMEd. They
> constitute about 1/3rd of incoming NOTGNOME bugs in the past 11
> months.

	Yes - it sucks. So - here is what I've done - in OO.o 2.0 there is a
nice crash reporting tool; we're trying to get it de-Sun-branded so we
can use that instead of bug-buddy. It makes most sense to get those bugs
to OO.o up-stream I think, and avoid bug-buddy.

	I've removed the bug-buddy patch from the development branch / 2.0
ooo-build work - and I imagine it's incidence will begin to drop sharply
in the real world post June.

> * if they were useful, michael, dan, would you like us to keep them
> and/or shunt them somewhere?

	Sadly they're almost certainly not useful; so much has changed to 2.0
that there's really not much point.

	Anyhow - sorry for the pain - if you can add a regexp filter on your
incoming mailbox (procmail or whatever) to bin it please go for it.

	Thanks,

		Michael.

-- 
 michael meeks novell com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot