Re: [Evolution-hackers] Patch Review process

["JP Rosevear" <jpr novell com>]

On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 20:05 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> hi All,
> 
> During the irc meeting last week,  we discussed the pros and cons of 
> deprecating evolution-patches and using bugzilla as the treasure
> bag for patches.
> 
> 
> A quick recap of the main points in favor of Bugzilla - 
>       * we tend to 'lose' patches in e-p. Bugzilla is more sticky. 
>       * easier for downstream packagers to release updates. 
>       * b.g.o can be queried for un/reviewed patches.
> 
> the other side of the coin : 
>       * bgo is much slower than reading mails 
>       * you need to be on-line to pull down the patches.
> 
> Fresh thoughts, any ?

Yes.  The ideal way might be to use bugzilla for patches and see if we
could get automated mails to e-p containing the bug number, product,
component and summary (and a link) if a patch is attachment is set on a
bug.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.

_______________________________________________
evolution-hackers maillist  -  evolution-hackers lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers