Re: keyword proposal for bugs blocked by a freeze

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 09:11 -0700, Elijah P Newren wrote:

> On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Luis Villa wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 09:43 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > Sounds useful.
> > > I think that this keyword should be considered only when a bug has a
> > > PATCH ready to be committed.
> >
> > Yeah. I was thinking that somehow we could incorporate patch into the
> > name, for just that reason. PATCH_FROZEN or something? Dunno. We should
> > definitely get something like this in place soon, though- maybe if we
> > don't figure out something better by tomorrow, we go ahead and use
> > BLOCKED_BY_FREEZE?
> 
> The only think I can come up with that sounds reasonable to me is
> PATCH_BLOCKED_BY_FREEZE, but that just seems too long.  How about just
> modifying the description slightly, that is:
> 
> Keyword name: BLOCKED_BY_FREEZE
> Keyword description: This keyword should be used for bugs for which
>     action can be taken by the maintainer once feature/ui/string/code
>     freeze is removed, but for which all further actions are blocked
>     until that time.  Should be reserved for bugs containing a patch
>     that is ready to be committed.

Seems reasonable. Do you have the permissions to add this, Elijah?
Luis