Re: "Patches without the PATCH keyword" Bugzilla query

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 09:24 -0600, Elijah P Newren wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Luis Villa wrote:
> 
> > Basically bugs without bug status. A bug gets off this list by marking
> > all patches on it either obsolete, needs-work, or
> > accepted-commit_after_freeze.
> 
> We really have that status?  Wouldn't accepted-commit_after_thaw be more
> what we want?  I'm afraid people won't understand
> accepted-commit_after_freeze and will apply patches when they
> shouldn't be.

I see your point, though I can't imagine anyone bright enough to write a
useful patch missing the point on that one. It's not too late to change,
though, I guess... anyone else feel strongly one way or the other?
Luis