Re: "Patches without the PATCH keyword" Bugzilla query
- From: Luis Villa <louie ximian com>
- To: Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
- Cc: Alexander Winston <alexander winston comcast net>, gnome-bugsquad gnome org
- Subject: Re: "Patches without the PATCH keyword" Bugzilla query
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 13:22:21 -0400
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 18:20 +0100, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 13:13 -0400, Alexander Winston wrote:
> > Thanks to the wonderful addition of "Advanced Querying Using Boolean
> > Charts," I have completely rewritten my "Patches without the PATCH
> > keyword" query. It looks for bugs that have patches but lack the
> > all-important PATCH keyword attached to them.
>
> The important metadata now is not the PATCH keyword, but the ispatch
> thingy and the attachment statuses. PATCH will disappear one day when we
> migrate the last remaining patches onto attachment statuses, and when we
> fix that bug in bugzilla about making querying for them easier.
Yeah. A good query at this point would be 'bugs with PATCH keyword or
with otherwise attached PATCH but without a set patch status', so we
could start on the work of killing PATCH.
Luis
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]