Re: GNOMEVER2.1 and GNOMEVER2.3 keywords

[Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>]

On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:21:13PM -0800, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 20:39, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > Can somebody with the appropriate permissions fix the descriptions for
> > the GNOMEVER2.1 and GNOMEVER2.3 keywords?
> > 
> > We should have a big warning on GNOMEVER2.1 to say that it should not be
> > added to any new bugs (it can't be removed since it will still be in use
> > on other bugs). Also, GNOMEVER2.3 needs its description amended to point
> > out that it is currently in use (and not a "for the future" keyword).
> 
> Looks like this 'malcolm commsecure com au' guy already has 'edit
> keywords' powers.  :)

Doh! It did not occur to me to look at my preferences to see what I had
been awarded in the past.

> I've gone ahead and done these two edits, though the GNOMEVER2.1 text
> could probably use a review.  TTYL,

Thanks, Greg.

Malcolm

-- 
The cost of feathers has risen; even down is up!