On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 20:39, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote: > Can somebody with the appropriate permissions fix the descriptions for > the GNOMEVER2.1 and GNOMEVER2.3 keywords? > > We should have a big warning on GNOMEVER2.1 to say that it should not be > added to any new bugs (it can't be removed since it will still be in use > on other bugs). Also, GNOMEVER2.3 needs its description amended to point > out that it is currently in use (and not a "for the future" keyword). Looks like this 'malcolm commsecure com au' guy already has 'edit keywords' powers. :) I've gone ahead and done these two edits, though the GNOMEVER2.1 text could probably use a review. TTYL, Greg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part