Re: the bug team and gnome2.2 [many responses in one email]

[Andrew Sobala <andrew sobala net>]

On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 17:02, Luis Villa wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 14:05, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> > Is a "qa-triaged" keyword, and strict instructions about who is allowed
> > to use it, good enough?
> 
> Possibly. Hard to say without going ahead and doing it.

Do you think we could go ahead and do it? Since I've actually _got_ a
qa-maint alias pointing at me now, and other people will start qa'ing
hopefully very soon, a way to mark bugs as qa'd is essential.

If we try something and it doesn't work, we can drop it. But it would be
really nice if we could start trying things soon ;) 

> > * A "Bugtable", like the Doctable, would be useful. Useful things to
> > include are:
> > 
> > -- QA contacts and if they are on holiday :)
> > -- No. of bugs without "qa-triaged" (or equivalent) set.
> > -- No. of "important" bugs (implementation depends on point above about
> > targeting bug-fix-times).
> 
> Yup. You volunteering to write a mock up in HTML, Andrew? :) 

If you're serious, I'll do a "first draft." Mock up, no code.

-- 
Andrew

"Someone needs to make a 'woops' command that reverts the hard disk to
the state it was in 20 seconds ago."
		-- me