Re: Ideas for upcoming Bolzano GTK+ hackfest
- From: Willie Walker <William Walker Sun COM>
 
- To: Brian Cameron <Brian Cameron Sun COM>
 
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
 
- Subject: Re: Ideas for upcoming Bolzano GTK+ hackfest
 
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:07:48 -0500
 
Hi Brian:
Note that the GTK+ hackfest is more focused on issues that relate to
GTK+ and the future of GTK+.  It is probably not a good forum to deal
with issues where applications are not properly implementing GTK+ a11y
features, and other issues which do not relate directly to GTK+.
Thanks for clarifying the constraints are for GTK+ only and no other 
discussion is allowed or permitted.  This definitely narrows things, but 
also opens up some stuff, too.
I have a few things that would be great to get a handle on:
1) http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=535827 - the current 
solution of using environment variables is deemed distasteful by some, 
but nobody has been able to offer a better solution.  Hackers might 
try to look at this one hard.
This seems like an issue that would be appropriate to discuss.
Yep - even if the existing 'hacks' include changes in things outside 
GTK+ (e.g., atk, java, OOo, Gecko), GAIL is indeed part of GTK+ and the 
module loading is part of GTK+.  One thing that might be considered here 
is whether a11y modules are different enough from other GTK+ modules to 
warrant a newer/separate way to load them.
<<<numerous items questioning the appropriateness of items deleted now 
that the constraints are clearer>>>
It might be good if someone on the a11y team were to review
a11y-specific GTK+ bugs to see what issues might be good to discuss.
This is definitely a good idea, and is what I mean by "open up" above. 
Most of the GTK+ a11y bugs have been pushed aside or ignored, and this 
might be a good venue to unclog them:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=gtk%2B&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=accessibility&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailqa_contact2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
We can also go through our list of known GTK+ issues to make sure the 
"accessibility" keyword is on them.
Will
[
Date Prev][
Date Next]   [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]   
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]