Re: GNOME A11y: where do we need to improve? (Want input by 25-Jan)



Hello,

Please don't get me wrong: In my previous post quoted below I did not want to say anything about the importance of the point about "having an onscreen keyboard that is more efficient for the users that..."

I only wanted to say that it is a need that exists and that has been proposed in the GetInvolved page; thus it should be considered, even if at the end it does not belong into the top ten.

By the way, what criteria do you intend to apply to establish the top ten list? Does it not depend on the resources available (a coder is not a documentation writer)? I assume there are things that need only little work while others need much work; the assistive technology needed by visually impaired users is probably not much related to that used by mobility impaired users,...

Best regards

Francesco

At 8:22 PM +0100 1/23/08, Francesco Fumanti wrote:
Hello,

Not knowing the state of the other ATs, I don't think that a top ten
list from my part would make any sense.

However, I would like to ask you to whether you could take into
account the creation of an "efficient onscreen keyboard for users
that have good control of the movement of the pointer" (regardless of
them using a real mouse or some AT like a headpointer), but that are
not able to use a hardware keyboard.

Regards

Francesco


At 10:23 AM -0500 1/23/08, Willie Walker wrote:
I've seen some good activity on the WIKI (thanks!).  I also need your
help with identifying the top 5 to 10 things that need doing on this
list.  Please be brave and speak up, especially those of you who have
expressed concerns about where the community might be focusing or
spending its energy.  This really is your chance to help influence where
things go.
_______________________________________________
gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]