Re: [g-a-devel] RFC: AtkText simplification

[Trevor Saunders <trev saunders gmail com>]

On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 09:18:49PM -0400, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
> On 05/05/2013 05:52 PM, Mario Sanchez Prada wrote:
>
> > So, let me get this straight... does this mean I do not have to
> > implement the after/before variants AT ALL in WebKitGTK+ and that I only
> > have to consider the START boundary?
>
> Piñeiro should officially deprecate the after/before variants in ATK.
> But from a functional point of view, Orca (the main if not the only
> consumer of this stuff) is no longer using them.
>
> I've not yet looked at the start/end stuff. I'll try to do that this week.

I wonder if there is a reason you prefer this approach to the ia2 one in
which after / before varients are kept,  but only the actual contents of
the word / line / whatever are returned not the word / line and the
whitespace before or after depending?

thanks!

Trev

> Thanks and take care.
> --joanie
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel