Re: [g-a-devel] RFC: AtkText simplification (take 3)
- From: Trevor Saunders <trev saunders gmail com>
- To: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] RFC: AtkText simplification (take 3)
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 05:44:19 -0400
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 08:37:16PM +0200, Piñeiro wrote:
On 08/09/2013 11:02 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
I think that in the end we shouldn't worry too much about this in this
scope. I would maintain the temporal wrapper to the old method for this
bug (fwiw, bgo#705581) and think about the other problem from a more
general pov. I wouldn't block this patch for that issue.
so its unclear to me how you do intend to decide if you need to use the
old method now.
The old method will be used as a fallback. That means that now the new
method will be called, and if fails, the old one will be used. More
about that on the thread "About the fallbacks related with the new
method get_text_for_offset, and deadlines"
well, that only works if you know it is always safe to look at the
memory where AtkTextIface::get_text_for_offset lives, but I guess in
this particular case you do actually know that (see below).
However if you don't intend to break the abi you need
to be sure the code that defines the atkobject you're dealing with was
compiled against atk headers that defined the new method or you could
end up reading some uninitialized memory and interpreting it as a
function pointer.
For that same reason, atk-bridge, that is the one that uses directly
atk, will pump up the dependency need for ATK. In the same way, in order
to not break the ABI, the new virtual method was added at the end of the
interface.
In the general case I don't think adding at the end is enough to ensure
you don't break the abi because other programs may put there own data
immediately after the AtkTextIface vtable, and can rely on its size
being constant in other places as well.
However in this particular case I see that AtkTextIface::pad4 has been
removed earlier this release cycle so adding a new method will just keep
the vtable compatible with what it was before then.
Trev
BR
--
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
_______________________________________________
gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]