Re: [g-a-devel] GNOME Launches Campaign for Accessibility
- From: Bill Cox <waywardgeek gmail com>
- To: gnome-accessibility-list gnome org, "gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org" <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] GNOME Launches Campaign for Accessibility
- Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2011 01:11:21 -0500
Since you bring it up, let's talk about it. There has not been a
single accessibility bug reported by the community that was closed by
the GTK+ team in two years. The calender doesn't talk, and neither do
most images, regardless of the dedication of the original programmer.
I submit but reports with patches to GTK+, and I am among many who are
ignored. Shall we get into specific bug reports still outstanding?
Shall we compare them to outstanding projects like Orca?
Bill
On 12/25/11, Jason White <jason jasonjgw net> wrote:
> Bill Cox <waywardgeek gmail com> wrote:
>
>> So, how do we separate the groups that deserve accessibility funding
>> under Gnome from those who seem hell bent on making life painful for
>> the blind?
>
> I don't think this is either a helpful or productive question to ask, and I
> doubt very much that there are people associated with Gnome who fall into
> the
> category presupposed by the question.
>
> If you have money that you want to put on the table, and if you're
> uncomfortable donating it to Gnome, you can for example offer it as a bounty
> for the completion of certain development tasks. Some software projects
> accept
> financial contributions under such conditions.
>
> If you don't have money to contribute, then I'm sure those working on ATK,
> AT-SPI, Orca and associated projects would welcome bug reports, patches
> or documentation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]