Re: [g-a-devel] Gnome-accessibility-devel Digest, Vol 57, Issue 4

[Ariel Rios <ariel gnu org>]

> I wasn't aware that Cspi was marked for deprecation.
Sorry for the confusion. As Li stated in one of the emails although
cspi was not marked for deprecation we have strongly discouraged its
use in favour of the python bindings. About 2 years ago Bill Haneman
and I were talking that any new development should not use cspi.

>>

>
> It was always the intention to support Cspi when moving to D-Bus for
> AT-SPI. The only problem is that time has caught up with us. GNOME 3.0
> apparently wishes to remove CORBA and Bonobo meaning that we have 13
> months to complete the project. Its my prefered option to continue the
> work on cspi, but as of right now there is no-one who has the time to
> work on them. We are all looking to find resources to work on cspi-DBus.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>