Re: [g-a-devel] Overview of DBus ATSPI design
- From: Olaf Schmidt <ojschmidt kde org>
- To: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
- Cc: Michael Meeks <michael meeks novell com>, Li Yuan <Li Yuan sun com>, accessibility-atspi-linux-foundation <accessibility-atspi lists linux-foundation org>
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] Overview of DBus ATSPI design
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 19:55:16 +0100
[ Li Yuan, Di., 8. Jan. 2008 ]
> One question is how do we handle remote applications that show on the
> current display?
In 2006, we discussed three possible solutions for this:
a) Use application-to-application D-Bus messages via TCP/IP (rather than the
system bus) for remote applications only. All applications would need to be
able to handle this special case.
b) Write a proxying demon that tunnels the necessary accessibility messages
via TCP/IP.
c) Extend D-Bus to support the remote case, e.g. by writing a proxying demon.
This would also be very useful for other users of D-Bus, such as desktop
services. David Zeuthen (from Red Hat) once said at an OpenAccessibility
phone conference that his company would be interested in having such a
solution.
For authentication, Bill Haneman suggested to reuse the solution written for
CORBA/AT-SPI. Do I remember it correctly that an ID is passed via XAtom?
If someone with knowledge of the CORBA/AT-SPI implementation details can
explain how exactly it is currently done for AT-SPI, then this would be
great.
Olaf
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]