Re: [g-a-devel] Use case for ATK_STATE_ARMED? Suggest deprecating if none.
- From: Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>
- To: Aaron Leventhal <aaronlev moonset net>
- Cc: g-a-devel <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] Use case for ATK_STATE_ARMED? Suggest deprecating if none.
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:45:17 +0000
Aaron Leventhal wrote:
I'm cleaning up Mozilla's state code today, that's
why all the questions
about states.
ATK_STATE_ARMED -- indicates the object is armed.
I had to do a Google code search to find this, and
the only place I see
it being used is in gailbutton.c
It's used only as the button is pressed and
released, which I think is
basically just a presentation effect with no
meaning. A state change is
fired, which to me is just an extra event with no
purpose.
Not entirely - ARMED means that if a button release occurs over the
widget in question, it will be activated. Not sure any AT is using this
info ATM but arguably still useful (since the ARMED state says something
about the behavior of the widget 'if' certain things happen - in this
case, a mouse button release within the object's bounds).
What's the use case for ATK_STATE_ARMED? How does
a user benefit? Or
should it be removed.
Hard to say about this one. But removal is not an option really - we
could deprecate it but not sure what meaning that would have.
Bill
- Aaron
_______________________________________________
Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]