[g-a-devel] Differences in docs between ATK and AT-SPI
- From: Aaron Leventhal <aaron moonset net>
- To: g-a-devel <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>
- Subject: [g-a-devel] Differences in docs between ATK and AT-SPI
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:00:30 -0500
I'm trying to learn about the difference between STATE_VISIBLE and
STATE_SHOWING.
Up until now I've been reading ATK docs because that's what I'm using as
an app developer. However if I do that in this case then I don't do the
right thing for SHOWING and VISIBLE. It's clear only after reading the
docs that AT developers use that something which is just scrolled off
should be VISIBLE but not SHOWING.
I know it's busy work, but I suggest it will prevent mistakes if we can
get the documentation in sync with itself.
ATK says:
ATK_STATE_SHOWING Indicates this object, the object's parent, the
object's parent's parent, and so on, are all visible
ATK_STATE_VISIBLE Indicates this object is visible
AT-SPI says:
STATE_SHOWING Indicates this object, the object's parent, the object's
parent's parent, and so on, are all 'shown' to the end-user, i.e.
subject to "exposure" if blocking or obscuring objects do not interpose
between this object and the top of the window stack.
STATE_VISIBLE Indicates this object is visible, e.g. has been
explicitly marked for exposure to the user.
Note:
: STATE_VISIBLE is no guarantee that the object is actually
unobscured on the screen, only that it is 'potentially' visible, barring
obstruction, being scrolled or clipped out of the field of view, or
having an ancestor container that has not yet made visible. A widget is
potentially onscreen if it has both STATE_VISIBLE and STATE_SHOWING. The
absence of STATE_VISIBLE and STATE_SHOWING is semantically equivalent to
saying that an object is 'hidden'.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]