[g-a-devel] Questions about the gnome-mag design
- From: Carlos Eduardo Rodrigues Diogenes <cerdiogenes yahoo com br>
- To: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org, "'xLupa yahoogrupos com br '" <xLupa yahoogrupos com br>
- Cc:
- Subject: [g-a-devel] Questions about the gnome-mag design
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:45:52 -0200
Hi Bill,
I have some considerations about the gnome-mag design that I would like
to argue.
Don't you think that the IDL interface only increases the complexity to
debug and difficult contributions from new developers to the project?
What are the reasons to have this type of design? I'm asking it because
I think that the process to listen the system events, process they and
show the magnified area can be done in a single program and this way is
much more simple to develop the system.
What do you think in an effort to merge what BAUM developed in
gnopernicus with gnome-mag to create a complete solution for
magnification, eliminating these CORBA dependecies/complexities?
Why not design gnome-mag to be a library (or only a program like I said
in the last paragraph) that support magnification and export an API in
C? I have doubts if making this program an object that can be accessed
throw CORBA is the best solution.
Thanks,
Carlos.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]