GNOME.org
 

Re: [g-a-devel]Re: Request to apply patch for bug #108664 in gnopernicus

Hi,
	You should email the entire release-team list with queries like this.
There are several people there who approve patches ...

	See my attached approval for the patch for #108664. As for the other
"Code changes in gnopernicus" patch, I think Murray's point is that this
is a simple build fix so you do not need release team approval.


On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 14:42, Paul Sprencz wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> 
> We are still waiting for the second approval from the release team for two
> patches. Murray Cumming approved both patches.
> The first request are fix the issues in presentation and in speech. (title:
> Code changes in gnopernicus)
> The second request is fix the issue of numpad  (title:  [g-a-devel]Request
> to apply patch for bug #108664 in gnopernicus)
> We have few days before the release and these patches are very importants
> for gnopernicus.
> 
> Thank you very much.
> 
> Best Regards
> Paul Sprencz
> BAUM Engineering
--- Begin Message --- 
Hey,
	Okay, I'm fine with that ...

	Approval 1 of 2.

Good Luck,
Mark.

On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 13:26, padraig o'briain wrote:
> This patch suppresses window:deactivate and window:activate event pairs 
> and a focus event notification which occur when using the numeric keypad 
> in gnopernicus to issue command to gnopernicus.
> 
> Gnopernicus requests that at-spi-registryd process listen for certain 
> key strokes. This requires that at-spi-registryd call XGrabKey, unless 
> XEVIE extension is available, which is currently only on Solaris.When 
> the listened for keystrokes occur FocusOut and FocusIn X events. These 
> cause window:deactivate and window:activate to be generated. The 
> at-spi-registryd prevents these events being notofied to a listener, 
> i.e. gnopernicus.
> 
> Essentially, it makes using the numeric keypad in gnopernicus, a key 
> part of its functionality usable.
> 
> The patch has been thoroughly tested by the Baum development team.
> 
> I do not think that there is any risk of regressions or bugs in other areas.
> 
> Padraig
> 
> Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Hi Padraig,
> > 
> > On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 14:33, padraig o'briain wrote:
> > 
> >>We have the attached patch for bug #108664. This bug blocks a number of 
> >>gnopernicus bugs and has been tested by the gnopernicus team.
> >>
> >>Permission to apply is requested.
> > 
> > 
> > 	#108664 is a pretty huge bug to read. Please try and help us make a
> > decision by giving us the following information:
> > 
> >  * What does this patch fix and what are the consequences to the user
> >    if this patch doesn't get in ?
> > 
> >  * In a nutshell what does the patch do ?
> > 
> >  * How well tested is this patch ?
> > 
> >  * In your estimation how much risk is there that this patch, will
> >    cause serious regressions/bugs in other areas ?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Mark.
> > 

_______________________________________________
release-team mailing list
release-team gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

--- End Message ---
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]