[g-a-devel]Re: Request to apply patch for bug #108664
- From: "padraig o'briain" <Padraig Obriain Sun COM>
- To: Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
- Cc: release-team gnome org, gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
- Subject: [g-a-devel]Re: Request to apply patch for bug #108664
- Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 13:26:04 +0100
This patch suppresses window:deactivate and window:activate event pairs
and a focus event notification which occur when using the numeric keypad
in gnopernicus to issue command to gnopernicus.
Gnopernicus requests that at-spi-registryd process listen for certain
key strokes. This requires that at-spi-registryd call XGrabKey, unless
XEVIE extension is available, which is currently only on Solaris.When
the listened for keystrokes occur FocusOut and FocusIn X events. These
cause window:deactivate and window:activate to be generated. The
at-spi-registryd prevents these events being notofied to a listener,
i.e. gnopernicus.
Essentially, it makes using the numeric keypad in gnopernicus, a key
part of its functionality usable.
The patch has been thoroughly tested by the Baum development team.
I do not think that there is any risk of regressions or bugs in other areas.
Padraig
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Padraig,
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 14:33, padraig o'briain wrote:
We have the attached patch for bug #108664. This bug blocks a number of
gnopernicus bugs and has been tested by the gnopernicus team.
Permission to apply is requested.
#108664 is a pretty huge bug to read. Please try and help us make a
decision by giving us the following information:
* What does this patch fix and what are the consequences to the user
if this patch doesn't get in ?
* In a nutshell what does the patch do ?
* How well tested is this patch ?
* In your estimation how much risk is there that this patch, will
cause serious regressions/bugs in other areas ?
Thanks,
Mark.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]