Re: [g-a-devel]Re: inconsistent in gnopernicus event process for HTML input widgets
- From: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- To: Simford Dong <Simford Dong sun com>
- Cc: gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]Re: inconsistent in gnopernicus event process for HTML input widgets
- Date: 28 Jan 2003 12:04:40 +0000
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 07:15, Simford Dong wrote:
> Hi Remus,
>
> Yes, there is much difference between gtk and mozilla toolkits.
> Firstly, Mozilla does not expose the relation (between label and its widget) to at-spi,
> but just return the label name when the widget is requested for getText().
> Secondly, the list-item and its parent (combo-box) are different accessible objects in Mozilla.
> When getText() is requested, list-item just returns the content of current selected item,
> not the name of its parent (combo-box), in other words, the name of corresponding label.
> So maybe Gnopernicus should adjust its event process to make all
> HTML input widgets work smoothly.
Hi Simford:
I believe that we (meaning the GNOME, Mozilla, and java-access-bridge
teams) should do the work to make our presentations as uniform and
consistent as possible. If Mozilla is substantially different from GTK+
in the presentation of basic UI elements such as HTML input widgets and
comboboxes, then I think the Mozilla implementations should be adjusted.
Although the gnopernicus heuristics should be as general and flexible as
possible, the UI presentations should also be as consistent as
possible. I believe that asking gnopernicus to conform to Mozilla in
all cases is unreasonable and will lead to less flexibility and
generality, not more.
The effort to offer the user a consistent presentation should not be
one-sided, it will require effort from all of us.
best regards,
Bill
>
> There is little change in Mozilla Accessibility since last November.
> You can use your old version for testing or just build it yourself from trunk tree of mozilla.org.
>
> Best regards,
> Simford
>
> remus draica wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch, but not this is the idea in which gnopernicus must work.
> > Possible causes of this behaviour could be:
> > - diferences between gtk and mozilla toolkits;
> > - missing some relations between objects or name of the object is not
> > reported correctly.
> >
> > I tried to see what the problem can be for this page.
> > My mozilla version is from 07 november 2002 from mozilla site.
> > For the page in atachament, I cannot see any relation between that combo and
> > label (text before label).
> >
> > Please send me an adress from where I can donload the most recent mozilla
> > version for more investigation.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Remus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
--
Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]