Re: [g-a-devel]GNOME Speech
- From: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- To: Marc Mulcahy <marc mulcahy sun com>
- Cc: accessibility mailing list <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]GNOME Speech
- Date: 11 Sep 2002 09:48:08 +0100
Hi Marc,
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 15:59, Marc Mulcahy wrote:
> Thanks Michael, will do on the ORB trace and let you know. The other
> interesting tidbit is that strings 10 characcters or smaller are marshalled
> properly, but over 10 characters come out on the client side as empty
> ("").
;-) Well - I can assure you that there are no hard-coded '10's in the
ORB ;-) It might be down to some memory pool difference for longer
strings or something; it sounds extremely wierd; you're sure you're
doing:
foo->str = CORBA_string_dup ("this is more than ten"); ?
Strange-- I don't have any arrays of 10 characters char[10],
> everything's dynamic.
Yep; same here :-)
> I'm the only one who has written code in GNOME speech, except I think Bill
> may have committed some namespace changes, so maybe just removing and then
> re-adding wouldn't be bad. It's not like there is much history here.
Fine; the concern is to preserve the history data at all costs; if
there is none - it's not so much a problem.
> Do you have a problem if I just go ahead and do it this way for 0.1, and
> then we can do cvs surgery for any future renaming (which hopefully there
> won't be much of)? Or maybe we have to do the surgery anyway.
Sounds fine - I'd just go ahead; the rule is an advisory only - there
is no way of making such rules stick ;-) be aware that most people do
this for fun, so you have to make the guidelines severe to stop them
charging right ahead.
> Thanks for the help.
No problem, when it's checked in I can help with the string problem,
let me know.
Regards,
Michael.
--
mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]