Re: [g-a-devel]Accessibility support in Glade



Calum Benson wrote:
> 
> Bill Haneman wrote:
> 
> > He's using the wheelchair at present, which while appropriate for
> > AccessX is *not* appropriate for general accessibility.

> True, but unless we can suggest an alternative (which we'll need anyway,
> for either our accessibility control center category, or accessibility
> capplet, whichever solution we decide on), I'm guessing that's what
> we'll be stuck with...

I think no logo at all is better, since the page where the logo
is located *expressly* indicates against using it in this context.

But I do think a logo is desirable, just NOT this one.

-Bill



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]