Re: [g-a-devel]gnopernicus robustness and a11y tools in the GNOME2.2 release
- From: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- To: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- Cc: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>, Luis Villa <louie ximian com>, accessibility mailing list <gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org>, gnome2 release team <release-team gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [g-a-devel]gnopernicus robustness and a11y tools in the GNOME2.2 release
- Date: 29 Aug 2002 12:44:40 +0100
Sorry to follow-up to my self, but I should clarify:
...
> There are some efforts underway in the second category for gnopernicus,
> I think, but even if the developers at BAUM who are doing the lion's
> share of the work
(I meant 'engineering work', not documentation; I believe (though of
course I may have misunderstood) that BAUM has expressed some hesitation
regarding user-level documentation. Personally I don't find their
English communication in any way deficient.)
:-)
best regards,
-Bill
> feel that they can't produce "product-level" user docs
> in English, any documentation (no matter how informal) that they can
> provide about running gnopernicus will be much appreciated and go a long
> way towards the creation and refinement of user docs.
>
> We need help in the first category as well, and I would suggest that if
> we can create a "seed document", perhaps cobbled together from mailing
> list discussions/assistance, then subsequent people who try to use those
> documents as a starting point can correct and refine that document.
>
> At the moment I believe the best documentation in both categories is the
> Gnopernicus README file, which does describe the use of a number of
> features and I believe contains a small bit of troubleshooting info as
> well.
>
> Perhaps a TROUBLESHOOTING file could be added to cvs, as a start, and/or
> installed as a man page or other GNOME-2 yelp document?
>
> -Bill
>
> > > Is that possible? since otherwise I somewhat regret to think that no one
> > > will test it or get interested in it :/
> >
> > Ultimately if hackers find it hard - users find it impossible; and
> > there is no excuse for bad runtime diagnostics.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Michael.
> >
> > --
> > mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> > Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
> Gnome-accessibility-devel gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]