Re: adding deps to libgnomecanvas

Hi Havoc,

On 26 Oct 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> The correct fix is to have a libglade equivalent in GTK itself, but
> that was rightly punted from 2.0.

        Quite - this is really why we feel safe moving libglade well down
the library dependency hierarchy.

> libglade isn't large, I don't think it's hurting anything. It's maybe
> 70K or so. If we only init the Glade module in libgnomecanvas lazily,
> you only pay if you use it.

        Sure - the distributed modules are fine; we just need some
marginal way to disable libglade support in the canvas for now, until the
canvas is shipped on every system and Tim can depend on the system version
instead :-) that is - until beast is built into an embedded system.



 mmeeks gnu org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]