Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule
- From: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>
- Cc: Jamin Philip Gray <jgray writeme com>, Iain <iain ximian com>, Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Stephen Browne <stephen browne sun com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 01:14:13 +0100
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> Someone should do an accessibility review as things are ported
> over. Acessibility isn't going to be free in all cases - the panel and
> the the nautilus icon view for instance have a fair amount of custom
> stuff and I don't know how you'd even go about desinging an accessible
> interface for it.
OK, seriously now:
...not free but maybe not too terribly expensive either. But the
'review' needs really to be something that everybody pitches in on,
since the real problem (I'm finding, anyway) is not fixing the problems
but being aware of them and monitoring the many decisions being made in
the far corners of Gnome that affect accessibility. If everyone keep
this in mind then I think those of use who are officially sanctioned to
do accessibility support as our primary job can be more effective, hour
for hour.
I of course would be *delighted* to give detailed assistance to anyone
who is considering the issue of accessibility support for their custom
widgets... catch me on IRC or email.
- Bill
> - Maciej
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]