Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule
- From: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>, Stephen Browne <stephen browne sun com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.0 Schedule
- Date: 10 Oct 2001 15:39:55 +0000
> I'm really starting to think that we should replace huge chunks of the
> UI for 2.2 (perhaps some chunks in intermediate releases such as
> 2.0.1), but we have _got_ to avoid that for 2.0 itself, IMHO.
see seperate message about rewriting with usability input ;-)
> So Stephen is right - we need a list of sub-tasks in each major
> component, e.g. "get the pager/tasklist working again," and who is
> doing them, and we need that list kept updated. Who owns this sort of
> issue on the release team?
it would be great if we could track these on bugzilla...that would
provide a very good mechanism for figuring out how much work we have on
the core for GNOME2.
-seth
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]