Re: GnomeModule, libglade

[Anders Carlsson <andersca gnu org>]

On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 01:30, Michael Meeks wrote:
> 
> On 23 Oct 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > > so anyway - does anyone have objections to putting the libglade
> > > support for things in the module where they come from (because i
> > > will actually do the work this time)?
> >
> > Certainly sounds more correct, if James doesn't know of issues with
> > it.
> 
>         FWIW I think this is the best way to go too - libglade is now so
> simple, small and elegant - it would be great to push it down the
> dependency stack. Similarly it'd be nice to stop dlopening these tiny
> libraries of widget lists for each of bonobo, libgnomeui, canvas etc. and
> just have them registered when the library is used.
> 
>         Do we have consensus ? Anders ?
> 

Yeah, sounds great!

//andersca
andersca gnu org