Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- From: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Jody Goldberg <jgoldberg home com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:50:20 +0200
Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> 1.) Which client side API should we use, either:
>
> - GConf client API or
Disadvantages:
- a C API, which needs to be wrapped for all scripting languages
- it not a standard interface, as opposed to the PropertyBag/Event
source interface:
* no code reuse
* you have to learn two different interface (bonobo and gconf)
- not able to handle CORBA_any
- exposes some backend internals, namely the "schema" thing.
> - The bonobo API (PropertyBag/EventSource/Monikers)
none of the above disadvantages ;-)
- Dietmar
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]