Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf vs. bonobo-config
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:40:50 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > If bonobo-conf uses GConf on the backside, I would hope end-developers
> > can choose between the GConf C API and the Bonobo-based API on an
> > app-by-app basis.
>
> Yes, and that is why I wrote the "gconf:" moniker.
So why not just remove anything else (if the other monikers are really
useful, just port them to GConf proper), rename it to config: and be done
with it.
--
.--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
`---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
Lehet, hogy elvesztettem az eszemet, de van valamelyik lemezen egy backup-om.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]