Re: GConf debate ... the hermenutical key.
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>, Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>, Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>, Ramiro Estrugo <ramiro fateware com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf debate ... the hermenutical key.
- Date: 17 Jun 2001 17:19:01 -0400
> > Yes, GConf was first. But what is wrong when someone tries to make things
> > a little better. For example we can use CORBA_any now - so there is no
> > longer any reason to use GConfValue.
> >
>
> -> we already released that API and have to support it
We are talking GNOME 2.0 here. And we have broken more APIs for this
release that I can list in the next couple of hours (speaking of Gtk+
only here).
Few applications use GConf and it would take little effort to migrate
them to a better system. The only limitation to do such migration
would be pride.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
