Re: GConf debate ... the hermenutical key.
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com>
- Cc: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>, Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik sun com>, Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>, Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>, Ramiro Estrugo <ramiro fateware com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org, gconf-list gnome org, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GConf debate ... the hermenutical key.
- Date: 16 Jun 2001 19:59:04 -0400
Dietmar Maurer <dietmar ximian com> writes:
> Yes, GConf was first. But what is wrong when someone tries to make things
> a little better. For example we can use CORBA_any now - so there is no
> longer any reason to use GConfValue.
>
-> we already released that API and have to support it
You can add and have added the new interface with CORBA_any and we'll
gradually migrate to it if people like it more.
There's nothing wrong with trying to make things better, btw. But we
don't have the luxury of starting from scratch.
I think GConf users really appreciate the fact that I haven't been
breaking the API much.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
