Re: why bonobo-config
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- To: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: why bonobo-config
- Date: 29 Aug 2001 21:07:02 +0200
On Wed, 2001-08-29 at 20:33, Sander Vesik wrote:
> On 29 Aug 2001, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > it seems to me that we, GNOME hackers, don't learn from our past
> > experiences :-( That is, when the GConf vs BonoboConfig war, we ended
> > up, AFAIR, agreeing on using BonoboConfig for accessing the
> > configuration, and there were some mails from many people agreeing on
> > the commitment to Bonobo for the GNOME platform.
> >
>
> I can't let this pass - yes, there is a commitment to bonobo - and I have
> not seen anybody dispute it. This is not the same as saying that whatever
> comes along having bonobo in the name or happens to use bonobo is
> therefore the correct answer.
>
yes, I agree, I was not saying that. I was just answering to the
GObject/CORBA_Object Maciej mentioned.
cheers
--
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org> - <rodrigo ximian com>
http://www.gnome-db.org/ - http://www.ximian.com/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]