Re: Is GNOME 2 dead ?

Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:

> Martin, stop with the melodrama.  DISCUSS THE TECHNICAL
> ISSUES. Michael and George have started doing so. Join in the
> thread. Get on IRC or the phone if things aren't productive. Sort it
> out. We are not 5 years old here. 
> > But it looks like Anders Carlsson is god and thus rules don't apply
> > to him - and I'm the bad guy because I reverted his unauthorized
> > changes.

Hi Havoc,

> Anders is now the maintainer, he can't make "unauthorized" changes. 
> He may make changes we are unhappy with, in which case we can object
> to those, file bugs, discuss it on the list. So please do that. But
> RELAX. Please. ;-)

well, I remember that in May it was you who told me that being the
libgnome maintainer doesn't authorize me to make changes in libgnome
which affect the whole platform without discussing.

We talked about this and sorted it out and then everything went fine -
but now that Anders is the maintainer this rule doesn't seem to apply

> I don't know who has done CVS commits, reversions or otherwise; I
> haven't looked at commits list. But no one should be touching CVS
> until things are sorted out. Have you been on IRC/phone yet? If not
> then you are part of the problem. Get on there and fix it.

Talking on IRC or the phone really sounds like a good idea to me - but
let's do it tomorrow or Friday, I'm going to leave for the evening in
about an hour anyways.

Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]