Re: audiofile problems.

[Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>]

Dave Camp <dave ximian com> writes:

> audiofile-0.2.0 changes the name of the shared library file.  This
> breaks anything previously linked against 0.1.9.  Since this is
> supposed to be a binary compatible release, I figure this should
> probably be considered a bad thing.
> 
> dave drizzt:~/ % ls audiofile-0.2.0/libaudiofile/.libs/*.so*
> audiofile-0.2.0/libaudiofile/.libs/libaudiofile-0.2.so.0
> audiofile-0.2.0/libaudiofile/.libs/libaudiofile-0.2.so.0.0.1
> audiofile-0.2.0/libaudiofile/.libs/libaudiofile.so
> dave drizzt:~/ % ls audiofile-0.1.9/libaudiofile/.libs/*.so*
> audiofile-0.1.9/libaudiofile/.libs/libaudiofile.so
> audiofile-0.1.9/libaudiofile/.libs/libaudiofile.so.0
> audiofile-0.1.9/libaudiofile/.libs/libaudiofile.so.0.0.0
> 

OK, we're going back to 0.1.9 then. I hav e now adjusted the staging
area.

 - Maciej