Re: Please test compile the staging area for the beta

[Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>]

Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc cu-portland edu> writes:

> On 16 Feb 2001 14:10:26 -0800, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> > 
> > We have what we believe can be the set of tarballs for GNOME 1.4 Beta
> > 1 now at:
> > 
> > ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/stable/staging/gnome-1.4beta1-STAGING
> > 
> > We would like the first beta to at least compile, so please try
> > compiling the packages and post to <gnome-1 4-list gnome org> if there
> > are any problems. I believe the following order of building packages
> > will work (pleae correct it if it does not work for you):
> > 
> > 
> > Development Platform
> > -----------------
> > xml-i18n-tools
> > libxml
> > audiofile           
> > esound
> > imlib
> > glib
> > gtk+
> > gdk-pixbuf
> > ORBit
> > oaf
> > GConf
> > control-center (*)
> > gnome-vfs
> > gnome-libs
> > gnome-print
> > bonobo
> > ammonite
> > medusa
> > libghttp
> > libglade
> > libgtop
> 
> Why is this so radically different from the one listed in the GNOME
> user's FAQ?  http://www.gnome.org/faqs/users-faq/compiling.html#AEN311
> I'd think we should be using that order with the new packages inserted
> where appropraite.  If we're not going to use the order from the FAQ
> with additions, I think control-center depends on gnome-libs.  I've not
> found anything else that's broken just yet, but I'm still looking.  (I
> have one report of the imlib-config being broken, but I haven't gotten
> that far).  Later,
> 

It's different because I completely made it up and did not know about
the one in the faq. I'll try to do something based on the one in the faq.

 - Maciej