Re: Please test compile the staging area for the beta
- From: Gregory Leblanc <gleblanc cu-portland edu>
- To: gnome-1 4-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Please test compile the staging area for the beta
- Date: 17 Feb 2001 10:19:23 -0800
On 16 Feb 2001 14:10:26 -0800, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> We have what we believe can be the set of tarballs for GNOME 1.4 Beta
> 1 now at:
>
> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/stable/staging/gnome-1.4beta1-STAGING
>
> We would like the first beta to at least compile, so please try
> compiling the packages and post to <gnome-1 4-list gnome org> if there
> are any problems. I believe the following order of building packages
> will work (pleae correct it if it does not work for you):
>
>
> Development Platform
> -----------------
> xml-i18n-tools
> libxml
> audiofile
> esound
> imlib
> glib
> gtk+
> gdk-pixbuf
> ORBit
> oaf
> GConf
> control-center (*)
> gnome-vfs
> gnome-libs
> gnome-print
> bonobo
> ammonite
> medusa
> libghttp
> libglade
> libgtop
Why is this so radically different from the one listed in the GNOME
user's FAQ? http://www.gnome.org/faqs/users-faq/compiling.html#AEN311
I'd think we should be using that order with the new packages inserted
where appropraite. If we're not going to use the order from the FAQ
with additions, I think control-center depends on gnome-libs. I've not
found anything else that's broken just yet, but I'm still looking. (I
have one report of the imlib-config being broken, but I haven't gotten
that far). Later,
Greg
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]