Re: l10n issues (Re: GNOME Releng web site)

["Julian Missig" <julian linuxpower org>]

I'm just curious as to how we'd keep gmc AND nautilus? Or are you proposing
that nautilus not be a part of 1.4? Personally, I can see nautilus being
stable enough in time...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Karl Eichwalder" <keichwa gmx net>
To: <gnome-1 4-list gnome org>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 3:13 PM
Subject: l10n issues (Re: GNOME Releng web site)


> Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com> writes:
>
> > I put some info at:
> >
> > http://gnome-releng.eazel.com/
>
> Thanks for relenging!
>
> An aside first: I do agree with Alan it's not appropriate to drop `gmc'
> -- it should be dropped when 2.0 will be released.
>
> l10n (localization): Even if we try to be ready in time some work will
> be left after the release (add missing translations, improve
> translations: consistency is one of the keywords).
>
> That's why I'd like to ask to re-release all major packages after a
> certain period of time (a month?) even if there was no bug to fix.  This
> would make us translators happy :)
>
> Yes, I know some package maintainers are brave souls already and have
> done this tedious job for the 1.2 series ;-)
>
> --
> work : ke suse de                          |          ------    ,__o
>      : http://www.suse.de/~ke/             |         ------   _-\_<,
> home : keichwa gmx net                     |        ------   (*)/'(*)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-1.4-list mailing list
> gnome-1 4-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-1.4-list
>