Re: Re: extra app list (revision)

[Andy Tai <lichengtai yahoo com>]

People on this mailing list can easily judge if your
argument makes logical sense by drawing an arbitrary
line between "image viewers" and "image editors" while
both are subsets of the GIMP's features.  

And you don't need to remind me what GNOME is.  I was
the one who suggested the statement in the Foundation
Charter that GNOME is part of the GNU Project and
supports the goals of the Free Software Foundation
(and the suggestion was accepted).

And for your info, the full name of gpaint is GNU
Paint.
 
--- "mathieu [ chaos chaos chaos since 79 ]"
<yeupou free fr> wrote:
> 
> Le mer, 08 nov 2000 22:38:09, Andy Tai a écrit :
> > Your argument can also apply to text editors.  Why
> > does GNOME include gedit when there is Emacs? (or
> > XEmacs-gtk for Gnome consistency)
> > 
> > Similarly, why eog when Gimp is there? (You can
> view
> > images with Gimp, among other things)
> 
> 
> not agree at all :
> 
> - eog is a image VIEWER, not an editor. (is gpaint
> only a viewer ?)
> 
> - Emacs is not (currently) a gnome software.
> 
> - XEmacs dont belongs officialy to the GNU project.
> If an Emacs-like editor
> should be added, it should be the GNU Emacs...
> (GNOME is also an official
> part of the GNU project, remember :)) )


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores.  Millions of Products.  All in one Place.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/