Re: about including gpaint
- From: jacob helixcode com (Jacob "Ulysses" Berkman)
- To: Jamin Philip Gray <jgray writeme com>
- Cc: Joe Shaw <joe assbarn com>, Ismael Olea <olea hispafuentes com>, gnome-1 4-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: about including gpaint
- Date: 08 Nov 2000 16:57:28 -0500
Jamin Philip Gray <jgray writeme com> writes:
> > > I don't agree with you. My graphic needs are 99% covered by a gpaint
> > > kind application. I don't have the time for learning how to use a
> > > powerful tool like gimp and I don't want to do so.
> > >
> > > You can think I'm not a common user, maybe you'll be right, but if the
> > > tool is done I think is good idea including it.
> >
> > Maybe my feelings are political, but I have a hard time justifying adding
> > an app that uses the forked GtkCanvas and doesn't depend on any GNOME
> > libraries to the official GNOME apps package. I would hate to see us
> > endorsing forking core GNOME libraries.
>
> Absolutely. This the Gnome 1.4 extra app release. With a few
> exceptions (like the gimp which is just a no-brainer for inclusion),
> all the apps should be Gnome specific, not just GTK+ apps.
The GIMP does depend on gnome-libs, although weakly:
[root woolly-mammoth jacob]# rpm -e gnome-libs 2>&1 | grep gimp
libgtkxmhtml.so.1 is needed by gimp-1.1.26-0_helix_1
Jacob
--
"I've got nothing to say but that's ok." -- John Lennon
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]