Re: Minutes of 1.4 Release Committee (Dec 7, 2000)



Dan Mueth <d-mueth uchicago edu> writes:

> GDM:
>   * We need a good gdm.
>   * It is not getting much attention.
>   * gdm3 is unlikely to be done in time.
>   * gdm2 needs a lot of patches.
>   * Jacob agreed to merge in the existing patches to gdm2 to 
>     produce a good version for 1.4.

OK, this is ridiculous.  Can we get the code for gdm3 in whatever
state it is and find a new maintainer?

  Federico




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]