Re: Decoupling GNOME Office?
- From: Pat Eyler <pate gnu org>
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- Cc: gnome-1 4-list gnome org, gnome-devel-list gnome org,gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Decoupling GNOME Office?
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 00:48:56 -0400 (EDT)
On 29 Aug 2000, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> Jody Goldberg <jgoldberg@home.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 04:01:22PM -0400, Pat Eyler wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd far rather see a separate relase of GNOME Office (G.O.) a bit after
> > > the 1.4 GNOME release. Certainly the 1.4 release would need to include
> > > the infrastructure bits (guppi et al.) that G.O. will depend on. My
> > > reasons are:
> > > * I'd rather see G.O. listed as a 1.0 release - it hasn't gone through
> > ^^^^^
> >
> > I'd rather not do that. [...]
> > Until the various office components are even marginally integrated
> > there seems little utility in releasing them together. The
> > integration will not occur until things are more bonobized. There
> > is no need to rush.
>
> Well right now we're stuffing all the semi-mature ones in the GNOME
> release itself. [...] We could simply drop the large apps from the
> GNOME release and release them all separately at about the same time as
> GNOME 1.4.
>
> In either case, I think it's bad to include office suite components
> with the core release, and a bad idea to wait until they are all ready
> and well-integrated before splitting them off.
>
This is the point I was getting at. I would rather see a bundle of
applications as a separate download, and not have a bunch of almost ready,
but not quite integrated office apps in the GNOME 1.4 release itself.
-pate
> - Maciej
>
>
>
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]