Re: Some proposed package removals and additions
- From: Federico Mena Quintero <federico helixcode com>
- To: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>
- Cc: Joe Shaw <joe helixcode com>, gnome-1 4-list gnome org,gnome-hackers gnome org, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Some proposed package removals and additions
- Date: 28 Aug 2000 16:59:34 -0400
Elliot Lee <sopwith@redhat.com> writes:
> Should it come down to it, I don't think Evolution is reason enough to
> delay GNOME 1.4 - the point of GNOME releases is to make a good desktop
> environment available, and while accompanying apps are certainly nice (and
> essential to the success of the project as a whole), they are not
> essential to a core desktop release like Nautilus is.
I think neither the Evolution nor the Nautilus teams know enough about
the status of each other's projects to make a decision. Each team is
too busy hacking on their own stuff to pay much attention to the other
one.
And if you look at both projects from a 10,000 meter altitude, they
seem to be about equally buggy, unstable, undocumented, and
unfinished. It's nothing to worry about; they are just not Done(tm).
Saying "<blah> is more important for GNOME 1.4" is pretty much
pointless, as both projects are pretty much indispensable for 1.4 to
kick ass anyways.
Federico
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]