Re: Some proposed package removals and additions
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs eazel com>
- To: Joe Shaw <joe helixcode com>
- Cc: gnome-1 4-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org,gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Some proposed package removals and additions
- Date: 28 Aug 2000 13:43:36 -0700
Joe Shaw <joe@helixcode.com> writes:
> > 4) Add Evolution and dependencies
> >
> > Rationale: It should be ready at about the right time, and GNOME is
> > right now missing a good email application, a critical component of a
> > good desktop. Also, many of the dependencies are shared with Nautilus
> > anyway. I propose that we add this at non-critical level - we will try
> > to arrange the schedule to fit in Evolution, but if it would end up
> > delaying the release, we'd be prepared to ship without it.
>
> I think that, despite my "helixcode.com" email address, Evolution is an
> absolutely essential component for GNOME 1.4. Sure, when we were
> brainstorming the release cycle a few months ago, the GNOME 1.4 release
> was primarily for Nautilus, but now when you look at it, it appears that
> Evolution is going to be ready at about the same time.
Joe,
If Evolution is indeed ready around the same time (and I certainly
hope and expect it will!) this is a non-issue. We've set the release
schedule to try to make time for both, and I don't think anyone would
be upset by an additional slip on the order of a week or so.
However, in the unlikley circumstances, that Evolution is _not_ ready,
I don't think we should delay. Replacing gmc with Nautilus is a huge
improvement, and Evolution will be an incredible addition, but I don't
think the impact of either will be reduced if they don't happen at the
exactly same time.
That being said, I hope that Evolution will be ready and this doesn't
even come up as an issue.
- Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]