Re: Some proposed package removals and additions
- From: Bob Smith <bob thestuff net>
- To: Federico Mena Quintero <federico helixcode com>
- Cc: Elliot Lee <sopwith redhat com>, Joe Shaw <joe helixcode com>,gnome-1 4-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org,gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Some proposed package removals and additions
- Date: 29 Aug 2000 04:39:56 +0700
Ok guys. Is there any reason why we are crossposting to so many lists?
I'm probably not the only one getting multiple copies of everything. :)
> Elliot Lee <sopwith@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Should it come down to it, I don't think Evolution is reason enough to
> > delay GNOME 1.4 - the point of GNOME releases is to make a good desktop
> > environment available, and while accompanying apps are certainly nice (and
> > essential to the success of the project as a whole), they are not
> > essential to a core desktop release like Nautilus is.
>
> I think neither the Evolution nor the Nautilus teams know enough about
> the status of each other's projects to make a decision. Each team is
> too busy hacking on their own stuff to pay much attention to the other
> one.
>
> And if you look at both projects from a 10,000 meter altitude, they
> seem to be about equally buggy, unstable, undocumented, and
> unfinished. It's nothing to worry about; they are just not Done(tm).
>
> Saying "<blah> is more important for GNOME 1.4" is pretty much
> pointless, as both projects are pretty much indispensable for 1.4 to
> kick ass anyways.
>
> Federico
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-1.4-list mailing list
> gnome-1.4-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-1.4-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]