On Mon 2015-06-08 08:09:19 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
I just noticed I had forgotten to respond to this (was away on vacation when you sent it and I had intended to reply when I got back).
no worries about the delay; thanks for the followup.
Just wanted to say that I'm fine with this. As you said, I think it was a leftover from the cvs (and svn?) days.
cool. Is the plan to just change this going forward, or do you intend
to add retroactive tags to the existing commit? A retroactive tag would
be added like:
git tag GMIME_2.6.20 GMIME_2_6_20
(i don't think retroactive tags are critical, and you might argue that
they're just noise in the repo; i'm fine if you decide against them)
Also, while i'm asking for ponies ;) -- any chance that you might create
signed tags going forward? It would be nice for me to be able to verify
the integrity of the sources i'm fetching over the Internet, at least to
ensure that they came from the person i expect. Having signed tags
and/or signed tarballs for released sourcecode would help me not have to
worry about the integrity of the network between me and the gnome
mirrors/repos.
Thanks for all your work on gmime!
Regards,
--dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature