Re: Glom 1.10 soon

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 12:55 +0100, Armin Burgmeier wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 11:30 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 14:14 +0100, Armin Burgmeier wrote:
> > > As libglom/libglom_config.h I would suggest to remove all non-prefixed
> > > symbols from it, to prevent conflicts with a "config.h" 
> >
> > Thanks for fixing that, though I don't quite understand how you did it.
> >
> > However, there are some duplicate defines (the define is in both
> > config.h and libglom_config.h files) that are causing warnings in svn
> > trunk, at least when doing distcheck. Could you try to fix that? I guess
> > that config.h should include libglom_config.h.
>
> The problem is that config.h.in is generated by autoheader, which
> generates it by scanning the configure.ac file for all the AC_DEFINEs I
> think.
>
> I believe that to fix this, we would need to get rid of autoheader and
> maintain the config.h.in ourselves. This means, whenever adding an
> AC_DEFINE to configure.ac, we will either need to add it to config.h.in
> or to glom/libglom/libglom_config.h.in, depending on whether its
> properly prefixed (and meant for installation) or not.

Fair enough. I hoped you'd find a correct way to still use autoheader,
but let's not waste time on it.

> I did this, however, I cannot test it right now since glom trunk does
> not build for me because of bug #576069.

You just need to update gtkmm.

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com