Re: [glade--]how to install glademm on RHL9
- From: Susumu Yoshida <susumu yt com>
- To: Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de>
- Cc: glademm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [glade--]how to install glademm on RHL9
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 23:50:11 +0900
Thank for your reply again.
I am really sorry that I annoy you with an unfamiliar distribution.
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:56:23 +0100
Christof Petig <christof petig-baender de> wrote:
> Susumu Yoshida schrieb:
> > even though I already installed "libsigc++-1.2.5".
> but not libsigc++-devel-1.2.5
Yes I did.
> I really advise you to ask someone more familiar with redhat and fedora.
> I thought that your package manager (yam isn't that) would resolve
> dependancies for you. Doing this (or searching for individual packages
> on the net) by hand is really not up to the time.
OK. I will ask the same question on another mailing list.
> If your linux distribution cannot give you automatic dependancy
> resolution (which I clearly doubt, given that RH/fedora still has
> users), you should consider a decent distribution. Perhaps apt-rpm is
> the correct solution for you.
According to you, I installed apt-rpm and tried again but failed.
nana:/home/susumu/SRC# apt-get install libsigc++-devel
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
libsigc++-devel is already the newest version.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 removed and 94 not upgraded.
nana:/home/susumu/SRC# apt-get install libsigc++
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
libsigc++ is already the newest version.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 removed and 94 not upgraded.
nana:/home/susumu/SRC# apt-get install gtkmm2
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that
the package is simply not installable and a bug report against
that package should be filed.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gtkmm2: Depends: libsigc-1.2.so.5
E: Broken packages
See? The newest version of both libsigc++ and libsigc++-devel are
already installed on my machine but when I try to "apt-get install gtkmm2",
it says "libsigc-1.2 is UNMET".
Does it make sense?
You say
> Shocked and glad to not _had_ to compile gtkmm myself for several years
but is it much easier to use gtkmm on Debian (which is
your distribution,right?) ?
--
from Susumu Yoshida(susumu yt com)
Powered by Red Hat Linux
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]