Re: [Gimp-user] Problem importing raw Minolta and Sony files

[Partha Bagchi <partha1b gmail com>]

Can you provide an example image to confirm this?

Thanks,
Partha


On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Jeffery Small <jeff cjsa com> wrote:

> Alexander Rabtchevich <alexander v rabtchevich gmx net> writes:
>
> > When you look at an imported image in darktable without applying any
> > corrections, the program shows you the embedded preview, which was made
> > by the camera itself with all the corrections it (the camera) would made
> > with the original RAW when converting it to jpg. If you applyin UFRaw a
> > camera curve, similar to the one in darktable, you will see the similar
> > result...
>
> It's true that the lion image imported into UFRaw is terribly over exposed,
> but that is something that UFRaw is doing to the raw data.  The original
> image has proper exposure which was confirmed at the time the picture was
> shot as well as the proper exposure from the companion JPEG image (I shoot
> RAW+JPG).  In UFRaw the histogram is shoved completely to the right edge
> of the spectrum and there is no way to use this tool to fix the picture as
> most of the image detail is already lost.  When I open the same file in the
> DiMAGE Image Viewer software from Minolta (on a Windows XP machine), the
> raw image looks just fine and can be tweaked.
>
> So I have to assume that this is a serious bug in UFRaw and I have reported
> it as such.  I'm just confused that I have not heard other people
> complaining
> about this problem.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-user-list mailing list
> List address:    gimp-user-list gnome org
> List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list